Thu 17 May 2007
And In This Corner… Steve Black
Posted by Editor under Audio , Black , Democrat , Wulsin[25] Comments
Today at 4pm at his Indian Hill home attorney Steve Black will officially declare his candidacy to run for Congress in the 2nd District. Mr. Black is an attorney with the Cincinnati law firm of Graydon, Head & Ritchey.
Several days ago he was kind enough to let me interview him on the positions. I found him to be very a personable and sincere person. Only by reminding myself of how carefully guarded some of his answers were did the 30 years of legal experience come through.
While he made a point of telling me that he wasn’t experienced at running for Congress, he came off to me as someone who could get up to speed quickly. While he’s not a barnstormer, his opinions are refreshingly unboilerplate. We talked openly about abortion, health care, defense spending, guns , Iraq, and global warming. The fact that he veered right into a passionate advocacy of nuclear power was interesting in light of the issues here in the district. This will probably be the last chance to hear unvarnished answers from the candidate before he gets put through the standard wash cycle of campaign staffers, so enjoy.
I listen back at the interview and kick myself over how unprepared and rambling my questions were. Hopefully you won’t find them too annoying. I do love to hear myself yammer on.
![]() | steve_black_interview_5-15-07.mp3 |
The thing that struck many people right off that fact is that Black’s campaign manager used to be Vic Wulsin’s. If there’s a story there and you know there’s a story there, Mary Huttlinger isn’t spilling the beans. I’m sorry but Steve’s the complete candidate package just isn’t going to cut it. I’m sure that the weeks ahead will bring out lots of juicy gossip to wile away the months as we suffer through this God forsakenly too long campaign season. (Personally, I’m not sure how many more action items, urgent appeals, and heartfelt yet empty orations I can stand. Doesn’t anyone have a job anymore? Surely being a Senator takes time, doesn’t it?)
Bottom line, at this point Black’s candidacy is more significant because of what he is than what he believes in. As a man highly connected to some of the richest political donors in the country, his entry radically shifts the Democratic primary landscape. The question is how much? Many underestimate Vic Wulsin’s substantial backing from the liberal base in the district. Vic’s core is very loyal. This is a primary. Money doesn’t have nearly the edge that it does in the general. Candidates are rallying the base. Right off the bat I’d give her a 35% to 40% head start. Anyone (except one person) who runs against her will have to shatter a significant portion of that margin in order to have a chance. However, when you talk to anyone thinking of heading her off, including Black, the last thing they want to say is that they are running “against” Vic Wulsin. I’m running FOR mom, apple pie, and the right to drive around in oversized SUVs, not against Vic. Get an internal poll 30 days before the primary that has you down 20 points and see what sort of sucker punches your war room will be coming up with. As Reese Bobby always says, if you’re not first, you’re last.
Right now this pundit would have to say that with the name recognition, strong core, momentum from 2006, and battle experience Vic Wulsin still has to be considered the odds on favorite in the 2nd.
Politics is a deceptively difficult craft. Much like poker and Jackass, it’s easy for someone to look at it and think that they can be good at it. Steve Black will have to prove to people quickly that he’s got the right stuff to play this ugliest of blood sports. He says he does… right before he tells you that he’s never really done this before.
Well… welcome to the game, Mr. Black. The Ohio 2nd is the most talked about, action packed Congressional District in the country. Thus it is the nastiest. I do hope you’ve brought a helmet.
- BSB > OH-02: Add Steve Black to the List
- Daily Kos > OH-02: Steve Black To Run
- Politics Extra > A challenger for Wulsin?


Steve,
I’ve already offered to speak with 2 of your opponents regarding my experiences in the Ohio 2nd. I’d like to speak with you as well. I won’t bother you with multiple offers. This is it. I can help a Democrat win in November in the Ohio 2nd.
I do have one question… How is it that you get interviews with the person who writes on OH02 while other candidates don’t even get aphone call? Sorry, but this bothers me… I look forward to your call.
Jim Parker
Future Democratic Candidate
Southern Ohio – 2nd District
Is Black still a registered republican? That’s going to go over big in the DEMOCRATIC primary. Good luck with Mary. Wonder why she wasn’t rehired for the Wulsin campaign?
Gee I always wondered why Mary never returned my calls, or passed the messages on to Vic. Live and learn.
Without taking sides, I think it’s important to remind everyone what this should really be about. Let’s compare the candidates and discuss who is better qualified to take on Mean Jean and represent the second district. It’s a waste of time to throw around blame for last year’s loss. And frankly, what happens between Vic Wulsin and her old campaign manager is between them. People seem to be treating this like some sort of celebrity break-up… nope, sorry folks, it’s just business as usual in the game of politics. So let’s stop with the gossip and get down to business.
One of my goals with this blog was to try and bring the same level of excitement to Congressional races as there was to sports. If I just focused on what was going on on the surface this would be a very boring blog. Political candidates are by and large plastic coated people molded in the campaign staffer’s workshop. If you want to learn what really is going on you have to dissect the people doing the molding.
It’s a pretty simple question. Why did you switch candidates? Ms. Huttlinger answered the question. Why shouldn’t we discuss her answer, especially when it seems so disingenuous?
If you ask me one of my biggest mistakes as a blogger was that I got too close to past campaigns and didn’t write enough about what was going on behind the scenes.
It’s not just a question of who is best suited to take on Jean Schmidt, if indeed the alternative would be as bad or worse than Schmidt. Schmidt has some redeeming qualities (omg, don’t quote me please). As a laughing stock, she subjects the whole Republican Party to ridicule.
That indeed may be why the Republicans (with key assistance from Democrats) recruited one of their own to run in the Democratic primary. And they recruited him from the same place where they found the last esteemed gentleman of the 2nd district, the law firm of Graydon, Head and Ritchey.
That’s right folks, Rob Portman was recruited from the very same law firm to serve in the first Bush administration and then to run for Congress in the newly redistricted 2nd. All the pigs did was go back to the same trough, after realizing they were about to lose the seat.
I’ll even bet that it was Portman himself who asked Black to run — that’s the real question for Black, to explain precisely his relationship with his former law partner, now OMB director in the Bush White House.
Explain please why this is progress?
Lib: It’s not about taking sides, it’s about being smart and winning the seat. An unnecessary primary fight doesn’t help the Democrats. We have a great, tried and experienced candidate. Ask yourself who and why behind Black entering the race. Where was he in the last primary? Mary is just an interesting tidbit in this. I hope Wulsin has or attracts a better campaign manager. I don’t think it will be too hard to do given Wulsin’s results the last time and her ability to raise money. I’ll say this again – if Democrats want to attract good candidates, they have to support them. Cutting someone off who won 49.5% of the vote the first time out in an incredibly conservative district is stupid and disloyal. It doesn’t give prospective canididates a warm fuzzy feeling either. It’s not that easy to find qualified people willing to run
There is a need for change in the OH2 District and I am not sure that Vic Wulsin or Steve Black fill that need. Granted, both OH2 candidates have deep pockets for potential campaign capital, but both Wulsin and Black carry political baggage that will hamper them.
Vic Wulsin always struck me as a perkey cheerleader that could never quite connect with the common man/woman in the District. Therefore, she came across & got votes as the anti-Schmidt candidate – not as the best person for the job.
The political load that Wulsin carries is she comes across as a perky cheerleader with well intentioned but quirky ideas, not as a professional campaigner who can act effectively in Congress.
The long road to walk for Black is that he is unproven in the Democrat political arena, despite his civic service and former Republican credentials. Consequently, he will be labeled as a opportunistic carpet bagger trying to capitalize on resurgent Democrat ideals.
It is very strange to me that Wulsin and Black and the also-ran candidates (Parker, Sinard, etc.) have all announced they are running for the 2nd Congressional District this early. I even saw Greg Parker handing out flyers in his one man show at the intersection of I-275 & SR28 in Miami Township the other day! I hate to say it, but Parker looked like Don Quixote on his own fantasy trip. The bottom line is that by pre-announcing their campaigns, all of these Democrat candidates risk boring and alienating local voters with delivering their messages too early.
Other potential candidates as yet unnannounced? Lets see… Russ Arey = solid connections, ODP liason, and ardent Democrat. BTW, did anyone pickup that John Cranley has supposedly moved to Hyde Park and is NOW IN THE 2ND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT? Hmmmmm…. sounds like a real political fight between all these candidates is about to start with plenty of potential surprises…
Purple Piketonian Says:
<>
Purple Piketonian your political inexperience and lack of historical knowledge betrays you. Portman was not inexperienced in the early 1990s as you imply – he was a political insider at Congress. Portman first started on the political trail back in the mid 1970s. I met him for the first time when he was working as Campaign Manager for Guy Gukenberger on Cincy City Council in 1975. Portman was a Soph at Dartmouth College on sabatical. He worked as a Staffer first in the Ohio House, eventually as a staffer with Rep W.D. Gradison. Portman supposedly got the nod from the Repubs because he earned the spot and was seen as a “middle of the road” Repub who had paid his dues on other campaigns. It also helped that he was rich from the family crown jewel at Portman Equipment Co. that they later sold.
<>
Purple Piketonian, I will take your bet and call your bluff. Why don’t you call Black himself and ask him about this fake conspiracy you are trying to spread? It seems that you only see candidates dyed in black or white and you say they are not able to change their party colors. I suggest that we all take a wait-and-see position about Steve Black and see if he really has changed to a good color of Blue.
All political candidates deserve to be heard for full consideration of their ideas. Why limit the candidates free speech & public discussion at this stage of the political race through your use of smear tactics and innuendo? I may not agree with Steve Black, but he deserves to be heard, despite the broad stroke you are trying to color him. And you call yourself a Democrat who supports free speech?
HELLLLOOOOOO Seasoned! A reasonable voice among all this chaos — thanks for the real comments – let’s hope some read them (Purple Piketonian)and take them to heart.
Fake conspiracy? Free speech? Stephen Black and Rob Portman come from the same law firm. If you believe that is some freakish coincidence, then I have little respect for your powers of analysis.
Maybe Portman just couldn’t stand seeing his legacy soiled any further, but, um, I think Democrats have a right to know this information.
Stay tuned for my next fake conspiracy theory: I believe that Hilary Clinton has some relationship to Bill.
Jeeze – PP. Just because someone works at the same law firm doesn’t mean they are of the same political party – what an Ad Hominem Tu Quoque- MOST law firms maintain a selection of representation from both parties for the very purpose of covering all their bases. Shows how little you know. All it does show, as a matter of fact is, that Graydon Richey produces moderate, civic-minded, leaders – I guess you have a problem with that? I think you need to look more closely at their list of prominent laywers — there are plenty of lawyers who graduated from their practice and went on to honorable public service as Democrats – do your homework. AND don’t just pick and choose what info works for you — people like you are whats wrong with the Democratic party. If they don’t drink your kool-aid then they are automatically in the “bad” camp. Boo hiss.
PP have you been typing in BOLD CAPITALIZED letters on the Enquirer’s Politics Extra again?
Suppose, just for example, that Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden had been partners in the same law firm. Don’t you think that association might be considered relevant?
And from a Piketon perspective, Portman cannot be considered as “civic-minded.” He worked with David Hobson to devise a scheme for storing high-level nuclear waste here. Then he passed that plan off to Schmidt as he lobbied on behalf of the same contractors as US Trade Representative. Now Black rhapsodizes about the phantasmagorical nuclear delusions of those same contractors.
If that is “civic-minded” then I have a civic-minded plan to dump nuclear waste at the offices of Graydon Ritchey.
And oh, by the way, today the House Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee slashed the GNEP budget to $120 million from a requested $450 million. This makes it MORE likely that the waste will be dumped at Piketon, since there will be no large-scale reprocessing, even in the 2020s — and no local jobs from any of it.
Clearly, Schmidt anticipated this, and that is why she authored the bill to switch the funding of spent fuel storage out of GNEP, a program now in collapse.
Oops, did I say dump? No, no, I am only going to store it at their offices, on an interim basis, until the mythical “recycling center” in South Carolina is completed.
And lest anyone accuse me of sinister motives, I’m only going to do this as my contribution to the battle against global warming, the struggle for nuclear nonproliferation and all those other laudable goals of the nuclear renaissance.
I’m thinking a few dry storage casks in the hallway might boost the firm’s reputation for civic-minded projects.
SS:
A little sexist, don’t you think? Is Wulsin supposed to be sullen and dour (seemed to Jean elected though)? Wulsin has an M.D. and Ph.D. so I don’t think she’s the stereotype of the perky cheerleader in reality. If a man had a lot of energy and enthusiasm would you call him a perky cheerleader? I doubt it. What most people really object to in women who are in or who run for positions of authority is feminine characteristics, like a higher pitched voice, smaller size, more inclusiveness manner. These traits are seen as weak and lacking in gravity in a patriachal society. These traits are not weak but simply feminine. BTW, Wulsin is a change from the republican and Jean Schmidt.
DG:
Why the assumptions? Just because Wulsin is book smart doesn’t mean she has leadership or street skills. She’s a loose cannon and has embarrassed many of her supporters by her lack of social grace and inability to connect with people – if you disagree you haven’t spent 2 seconds in the same vacinity with her.
Many Democrats held their nose voting for her. But then again I am just repeating what people have said to me. Don’t attack the messenger – I am waiting to see how this all plays out but I agree with SS let Black be heard.
I remember a time oh say about a year ago when no one would give Wulsin the time of day and then people began to listen to her — WOW OH02 has two great candidates – we should be so lucky look …what the Rs have to choose from!
PP –
I assume because you live in Pike County that you are A REDNECK, An IDIOT, A REPUBLICAN, and &^%$ FARM ANIMALS. See how assumptions work?
Again, I challange you to review Black and Portman’s colleages – several of which have gone on to hold public office successfully as DEMOCRATS. Even the Enquirer knows this – can’t you read?
You can’t stand that can you?
Challenge is spelled with an E and the idea that Vic Wulsin lacks “social graces” is beyond absurd. It seems that Harvard-educated people must intimidate you.
R2B:
No assumptions, in my humble opinion, SS was attacking Wulsin not on substance but on being a “perky cheerleader.” Exactly what does that mean? Exactly what, where and when was she a perky cheerleader? Any comment on her stands on the issues? No. I am sick to death of choosing politicians by which ones come closest to looking like a laquered news anchor.
You have no idea how much time I spent with Wulsin. It was extensive, in big and small venues, door to door, in parades, etc. in Hamilton and Warren Counties. I never saw her act in the way you suggest. I did see a big improvement in her ability to give a speech and answer audience questions in a candidate forum from February to June 2006. Can you cite examples of this behavior you cite in your comment above?
From the beginning, people have underestimated Wulsin. No one ever thought she would even come close let alone win 49.5% of the vote in what was an extremely republican district. BTW, I’ve heard Black speak. Seems nice enough, but not very good at talking to a crowd. Definitely not ready for prime time.
And as for your comment about her being book smart – this country tried stupid and it’s not working out well. You don’t get to where Wulsin is in her career by merely being book smart. But I’ll take the ability to learn and be disciplined over Schmidt and Bush any day. Why don’t we give smart a try?
DG said:
“A little sexist, don’t you think?”
“In my humble opinion, SS was attacking Wulsin not on substance but on being a “perky cheerleader.”
Sexist? No, not me… I also contributed a significant amount of time, effort, & donations to Vic’s campaign. The political reality is that people make judgements about others based upon first impressions. Both myself and other Dems agree that Vic Wulsin simply did not & probably still does not have the right personna to be effective as a politician. This is an observation and not a personal criticism. She is likely an excellent physician/epidemiologist and a great humanitarian with all of her volunteer work in Africa, but this does not hold promise in gaining voter attention & votes in OH02. There is no doubt that Vic is enthusiastic (which most cheerleaders are), but her choice of words and expression of ideas in political settings is suspect. She should best use her skills at helping others in the medical field, politics & campaigning do not seem to be her strong point.
Case in point on concerns about her political awareness: Immediately after Vic won the Spring primary for the Dems last year, she felt compelled to announce her campaign platform at a meeting attended by many Dems and the local news media. The solution for health care & social security? Increase public taxes according to her, but she did not give any details. The solution for political warming? She would implement a huge government tax on gasoline. The Republicans pounced upon these gaffes and used these statements by Vic against her campaign for months to scare voters. A well politically aware candidate would have held back from these types of announcements until they had a plan fully researched and discussed with all campaign staff. She shot from the hip and wounded her campaign by her statements. However, she did seem to recover from these political mistakes as the campaign progressed.
Other examples of questionable political choices – why did she announce her candidacy for OH02 so early? I fear this will turn off & boor potential voters by starting the campaign 10 months before the primary. Why is Vic’s campaign hitting labor unions so early for endorsements when the candiate field is not even set? Thes tactics only turn off labor unions when they are pressured into making early & sudden political decisions.
One can only wonder, if Vic Wulsin had used more restraint on publicly announcing loosely organized campaign ideas, could she have picked up that marginal 2% of the vote needed to defeat Schmidt? Hmmmmm…. this is why I and labor unions are awaiting other candidates announcements to make their case in a full comparison of ideas.
SS: Exactly why we need a seasoned candidate. Newbies always make mistakes because they are inexperienced and cannot attract money and therefore experienced campaign operatives. You think Black or any other newbie won’t make mistakes? Even the very seasoned pros make mistakes. Darn, they’re human. Wulsin didn’t get the 1/2% plus one she needed maybe because the HCDP did squat for her and the DCCC was very late and not very forthcoming with money. Wulsin announced early because everyone knew Black was running two months before he announced. Unfortunately, we need real campaign finance reform that would limit the amount of money for campaigns and limit the time of the campaign. That would solve a ton of problems.
Thanks for noticing…
Remember one thing… the right Democrat is the only one who can win in November. Pipe dreams will never win an election against Jean Schmidt in November. You have to realize that we live in a country where, in the latest CNN polll… 75% of Republicans believe that George Bush is doing a good job. We live in a district where 7 out of every 10 voters vote Republican. If we give them the wrong Democrat, WE will be responsible for the re-election of Jean Schmidt.
Also, I am not a candidate right now and those were not campaign flyers. My time will come.
I’m on my way to see another 1,000 people RIGHT NOW.
By the way, are you a volunteer for anybody’s campaign right now? Just curious.
Jim PARKER
Future Democratic Candidate for US Congress
http://www.JimPARKER4ad.blogspot.com
Let me pull out by crystal ball to make a prediction… IMHO, Jean Schmidt is “dead meat” as far as her being a viable Repub candidate up for re-election to next years Spring primary. Schmidt is going to be defeated on the Repub side, most likely by Heimlich if the current slate of candidates stands. Republicans are not enamored with Jean Schmidt and her Congressional embarassment.
Therefore, I believe the OH02 election will not be incumbent vs challenger, it will likely be between 2 new Repub/Dem challengers. There are real candidates on both sides of the aisle that have not announced as of yet.
Those candidates who pre-announce now will lose the public attention and campaign momentum when their 15 minutes of media fame has passed them and the the local media moves to the next candidate announcement.
To answer JP’s query, no I am not affiliated at the present time with any campaign and I carry no ulterior motives in these discussions. My background may surprise you, but I prefer not to reveal my political history. I have not and will not commit to any Dem campaign at this point in time, but will do so later. This is why I can speak relatively freely and anonomyously. This is why I call myself “Seasoned”.
S
No offense friend, but nothing surpises me… You see, I’ve spent my entire career in healthcare and I have seen it all…
I know that the power of the human spirit is stronger than anything and I belive in the people that I tried to represent in Congress… and they know it’s true…
Vic, by announcing early has taken some of the money power out of the Ohio 2nd. If I decide to run, that helps my candidacy…
As of right now, I am not a candidate. I’ve told CB and VW what it will take for me to run this time. Have a nice day.
Jim PARKER
Future Democratic Candidate for US Congress
http://www.JimPARKER4ad.blogspot.com